|
Although the December 98 deadline
is past, the question for tank manufacturers remains the same; what
does the future hold? So far we have seen the EPA backing away from
their "do or die" stance; into a more manageable "these
are our priorities" stance. Some who have made proper preparation
are understandably upset. However, I believe it is best for the nation
as a whole that tanks continue to be upgraded, but without the strain
induced by the inflexible, across the board enforcement. EPA’s current
stance of continuing to pressure for the upgrade of tanks, while doing
it in a structured manner will allow the tank manufacturers and installers
to continue to profit. At the same time it will allow tank owners to
do upgrades at a reasonable pace and a reasonable price. I believe that
the demand for replacement tanks has longer legs than some anticipated.
Tank sales remain high for this year, and ConVault distributors and
licensee’s report that there are many sales in process. The federal
government itself seems to have a substantial amount of units still
to be upgraded. In the meantime, we must be aware that a very subtle,
yet powerful change has been taking place in the aboveground storage
tank codes and standards arena. Staying abreast of these changes is
going to be a state-by-state process. It is important that we communicate
these changes to our client base because it will emphasize that regulatory
forces are slowly turning their emphasis from the underground storage
tank deadlines to the aboveground storage tank industry. These changes
combined with some manufacturer’s attempts to lower the standards will
provide us with some unique opportunities for the months and years ahead.
|